If the ultimate goal of the southern advance on the late fase of the soviet-nazi conflict was to get to Baku and capture the oil fields to stiffle russian economy, why did Germany march the long way through land and didn't complement it from a naval invasion from Georgia/Odessa/Sevstopol when the siege was won? Thanks
1 Answers 2020-08-22
1 Answers 2020-08-22
1 Answers 2020-08-22
I'm curious about this in terms of seeing not only why they felt the Post Office as such should exist, but why?
If for example, the reason for the post office is "the federal government should ensure the timely delivery of letters" then why did they feel the timely delivery of letters was important?
4 Answers 2020-08-22
1 Answers 2020-08-22
Based on voting conducted in the Fifth Plenary Session of the 46th Central Committee of AskHistorians Moderators, we hereby announce the addition of three new comrades to our circle. They will be resolute in carrying out the AskHistorians’ party line, principles and policies, dare to lead and accept responsibility, unite together, and grasp well both revolution moderation and production engagement. They will not be intimidated by imperialists ultra-nationalists or reactionaries racists, and will be firm in defending the interests of the AskHistorians community. They are more than ready to strike against the ‘paper tigers’^(1) of single-line comments with their mighty banhammers!
The comrades in question:
/u/aquatermain, our International Relations and Geopolitics expert, with additional technical proficiency in the history of Argentina and revolutionary music Musicology.
/u/dhowlett1692, currently leading our Sub-committee on Witchcraft Accusations, with proficiency in the Salem Witch Trials and Early America.
/u/Abrytan, specialising in the history of Modern Germany and Resistance to Nazism. Supervisor of the research group on ‘Rectification of Questions about Hitler.’
Cadres Flairs and the working class community members rejoice! For our new moderators will always defend you against bourgeoisie poorly sourced comments and uphold the quality of our AskHistorians commune.
Communique ends.
---
^(1)The term 'paper tiger' was often used in Communist China to describe something appearing to be of great threat, but in actuality weak and ineffectual. This was especially used in terms of the nuclear bomb (because, well, China didn't have them for a period). For an example, see here.
Much of the language above is drawn from Chinese Communist Party Politburo documents, examples of which can be found here.
19 Answers 2020-08-22
1 Answers 2020-08-22
How does ground level physically get raised over time?
The only reply I seem to get is that 'cities get built on top of each other' or 'another layer gets added on top.'
But how does this actually happen physically?
How can you physically build a layer on top of another layer...?
Or does the ground sink, all at the same time...?
Or are some layers underground while others are out in the open...?
3 Answers 2020-08-22
2 Answers 2020-08-22
1 Answers 2020-08-22
Hi /r/askhistorians!
I'm on an Indiana Jones binge watch at the moment, and I was curious if there's any historical accuracy at all to the various tomb booby traps?
Things like pressure plates that fire arrows when you step on the wrong part of the floor, spinning blades and of course the very iconic rolling boulder scene.
1 Answers 2020-08-22
1 Answers 2020-08-22
With Roman legions taking slaves from defeated enemies (Caesar alone taking half a million in Gaul). How did people trust the slaves when they bought them?
Say that I bought a Gallic woman as a slave to cook and clean in my household. She is from a warrior tradition and in a house filled with knives and other cooking implements. I know I have the power of life and death over them but what if they didn't care? What if they were willing to die whilst getting revenge?
How do they trust their slaves? It seems an impossible risk to take.
1 Answers 2020-08-22
A lot of the recent brouhaha in the news about this seems to hinge on a single clause in the amendment.
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."
My understanding is that there is contention over what "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" means.
So...how was that clause understood in 1868 when the Amendment was drafted? Was there confusion about it at the time? Was there contention over the phrasing because lawmakers at the time had concerns over how it could be interpreted?
Also, were there any public controversies centering around the interpretation of that clause in either the remainder of the 19th century, or the early decades of the 20th? Up to the end of the 1920s, let's say. (The Gilded Age/Progressive Era of 1880-1920 is my favorite period of U.S. history, so I'll arbitrarily go with the end of that era for the purpose of the question).
2 Answers 2020-08-22
I saw Todd’s video showing a heater shield stopping arrows eventually, but letting the tip go a few centimetres through. I guess this is good enough, except for the arm holding the shield. I was thinking of adding a metal plate behind the shield under the straps as a solution to this issue. Was this done? If not, what could be the reason why it wasn’t?
1 Answers 2020-08-22
I see a lot of people drooling on them, but I cannot seem to find any relevant information about them, nor information not backed by spiritual websites: i.e. the wikipedia page about it seems to be making very vague arguments(cant even understand if they mean 650 BC or AD) and only few are backed by sources, of which most are crystal/spiritual websites.
1 Answers 2020-08-22
I’ve been fascinated by more modern history (I’d say 1800-present) since I was in second grade and, I’m sorry if this sounds cringy to some of you guys but, I like digesting history through videos more so than books. I don’t know, it’s just a personal preference. But I’d like to ask anyone if there’s any YouTube channels that you recommend? As of now I’m a regular watcher of:
The Great War and subsequently WW2 along with other channels relating it to The Armchair Historian Feature History and History Buffs
Is there anyone I shouldn’t watch and why? But if not are there anymore channels that I might be interested in?
1 Answers 2020-08-22
The Veneti as described in Julius Caesar's Gallic Wars had large seafaring ships that were described as taller than typical Roman ships, with high gunwales, which sounds to me almost like the ships of the late Medieval period. Do we have any hard evidence about the design of these ships, and if they were in fact comparatively advanced, the range of the Veneti's travels?
Do we know if the Veneti's shipbuilding technology or maritime culture survived the brutal invasion by Caesar, and if their seafaring continued afterwards? If so, did they influence later antiquity?
1 Answers 2020-08-22
What factors were used to determine if a person got comissioned? How would their experience differ? Why dont Sergeant Pilots exist anymore?
1 Answers 2020-08-22
1 Answers 2020-08-22
1 Answers 2020-08-22
I know it was important but how important was it?
1 Answers 2020-08-22
Call of Duty released a new trailer for their Cold War game called "Know Your History" and it contains many clips of Yuri Bezmenov's famous interview where he explains how the Soviet Union goes about subverting countries like the United States. Here's more of the interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQPsKvG6WMI
What do Historians typically make of Bezmenov's claims? What about this process of "ideological subversion" that Bezmenov talks about? Is there any evidence to back this up? Has this process been completed in any country during the Cold War? What's the evidence that the Soviets attempted this same process in the US?
1 Answers 2020-08-22