2 Answers 2019-04-27
I recently got into a debate with a couple of folks over whether or not armored cavalry were a thing in the Three Kingdoms period of China. As far as I'm aware, frontal chest pieces or barding started becoming more prevalent by the late 2nd century. But heavily-armored shock cavalry were not utilized, and it would not be until the middle of the Jin dynasty in the mid-300s that heavily armored cavalry became a thing in China. One source I found that supported this was CJ Peers' "Soldiers of the Dragon: Chinese Armies 1500 BC - AD 1840", which states:
"The 4th century AD is significant in Chinese military history for the introduction of cataphract equipment for cavalry, and for the first widespread use of stirrups. Whereas in western Asia the rise of fully armoured charging cavalry long pre-dates the invention of the stirrup, in China the two innovations seem to have occurred at about the same time. What little evidence we have suggests that the latter may have been an indigenous development, while complete horse armour appears to have spread from a point of origin in the north-east. The Hsiung-nu in northwestern China first obtained panoplies in 312 by capturing them from the Hsien-pi, who had migrated from Manchuria and probably introduced the cataphract horse into China proper. The earliest depiction in art is from the tomb of Tung Shou, a Ts'in warlord buried in what is now Korea, which dates from 357. It appears that cataphract cavalry spread through China fairly quickly illustrations from the period 385—94 were found in a tomb in Yunnan in the far south-west - but the tactics best suited to their capabilities took some time to evolve."
Based on that last sentence, it would seem to me that there was a lack of even a proto-cataphract-like armored cavalry, since they didn't even have knowledge of what tactics to use for heavier cavalry.
So my question is: how heavily armored were the cavalry, and what sorts of tactics were used to employ those cavalry? If cataphract-like embodiments of heavy cavalry didn't exist, did some sort of other heavy cavalry exist?
1 Answers 2019-04-27
I'm no white nationalist but I've heard the symbol actually started out in a fairly positive way, so how did the swastika come into use?
1 Answers 2019-04-27
[deleted]
1 Answers 2019-04-27
If they had no spears, sarissas but just pilums, a sword and a shield... They took probably take out of a few of the enemy cavalry with pilums but that wouldn't be enough.
1 Answers 2019-04-27
I recently learned of the movement's existence and would like to learn more about the phenomenon.
1 Answers 2019-04-27
there is little documentation online about this Indian two-handed shortsword. when I google it, the results are useless and the only sources I have about this weapons are an antique weapon forum http://www.vikingsword.com/vb/showthread.php?t=24384 , a youtube video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-srjwsP8yd8 and this PDF that mentions it vaguely by name http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/5515/10/10_chapter%207.pdf if anyone knows anything about historical weapons like this one please help,
1 Answers 2019-04-27
The Nazis had different triangle insignias for different prisoners. Red was for political prisoners, yellow for Jews, green for criminals, blue for foreigners, etc. My question is, what if, say, someone was both an anarchist (red triangle) and a trans woman (pink triangle). How would this be displayed?
1 Answers 2019-04-27
The AskHistorians Podcast is a project that highlights the users and answers that have helped make /r/AskHistorians one of the largest history discussion forums on the internet. You can subscribe to us via iTunes, Stitcher, or RSS, and now on YouTube and Google Play. You can also catch the latest episodes on SoundCloud. and Pandora. If there is another index you'd like the cast listed on, let me know!
This Episode:
In another return visit, Doug Priest, /u/TenMinuteHistory stops by! You can last hear him on Episode 95 talking about the revolution before the revolution in Russia and Episode 86 where we talked about what it takes to be a historian, the tools and background you need.
Doug has his PhD in Soviet History from Michigan State University. Currently, he is the Digital Managing Editor at Townsquare Media and the incoming president of H-Net which is the OTHER largest academic history and social sciences forum online. Today we are going to continue our discussion on methodology. We want to tackle a topic we’ve seen come up a lot lately - bias.
You can follow Doug on Twitter @10MinuteHistory and Brian @brimwats.
You can find the Jill Lepore piece we discuss here.
Questions? Comments?
If you want more specific recommendations for sources or have any follow-up questions, feel free to ask them here! Also feel free to leave any feedback on the format and so on.
If you like the podcast, please rate and review us on iTunes.
Thanks all!
Want to support the Podcast? Help keep history interesting through the AskHistorians Patreon.
1 Answers 2019-04-27
Basically after what events was Rome considered a serious power and to who? Obviously there’s not a definitive date but if you were to dumb it down?
IE: When would say Egypt have heard about Rome for the first time and then when would they have started to consider them their equals?
1 Answers 2019-04-26
1 Answers 2019-04-26
I came across this section in the Wikipedia article on the Norman conquest of England:
The largest single exodus occurred in the 1070s, when a group of Anglo-Saxons in a fleet of 235 ships sailed for the Byzantine Empire.[103] The empire became a popular destination for many English nobles and soldiers, as the Byzantines were in need of mercenaries.[102] The English became the predominant element in the elite Varangian Guard, until then a largely Scandinavian unit, from which the emperor's bodyguard was drawn.[104] Some of the English migrants were settled in Byzantine frontier regions on the Black Sea coast, and established towns with names such as New London and New York.[102]
I checked the citations for this section, but they don't give much more detail than what's already in the article, other than suggesting that if there were that many ships involved, it could not have been hidden, and they were likely given permission to leave by William the Conquerer.
Is there any more information about these exiles/refugees? Did they learn Greek? Why did they choose the Byzantine Empire and not another Christian kingdom? Were they well-received? Did the Byzantines have difficult diplomatic relations with William because of this?
2 Answers 2019-04-26
To me, a repeater would seem better as it has a higher ammo count, and fire rate. So why did many soldiers use bolt actions?
1 Answers 2019-04-26
[deleted]
1 Answers 2019-04-26
The armour of hoplites of the various Iron Age Greek city-states was made of bronze^1 , and their shields may have had bronze plating, yet their weaponry was made from Iron^2,3 .
As far as I understand, the reason that Iron was superior to Bronze was economic, as it was much more readily available, and didn't require complex international trade to acquire the raw materials (as Bronze did). Why then is bronze used at this period of time?
1 Answers 2019-04-26
There’s lots of information on the effects on Greenland but I was wondering how the natives were effected at lower latitudes
1 Answers 2019-04-26
1 Answers 2019-04-26
1 Answers 2019-04-26
I can't imagine nuclear reactors were known much then. Given that, when the United States started using uranium for weapons and testing did they grab a lot? Was it cheap then? Did it set off any alarm bells anywhere?
1 Answers 2019-04-26
1 Answers 2019-04-26
I asked this before but I didn't get an answer; My grandfather was in the army during ww2 and I was too young (7/8) to really know what he did during the war before he died and my mum doesn’t know either, just that he was deployed in Italy. Recently whilst going through some of his things we found a photo album with some of his things from that time and a lot of them have “Casarsa” 1947 written on it so I was wondering if it was relevant to his time in the war. He was in the RAF, DLI and RAOL as far as I can tell if that’s relevant.
1 Answers 2019-04-26
[deleted]
1 Answers 2019-04-26
1 Answers 2019-04-26
2 Answers 2019-04-26
Today:
You know the drill: this is the thread for all your history-related outpourings that are not necessarily questions. Minor questions that you feel don't need or merit their own threads are welcome too. Discovered a great new book, documentary, article or blog? Has your Ph.D. application been successful? Have you made an archaeological discovery in your back yard? Did you find an anecdote about the Doge of Venice telling a joke to Michel Foucault? Tell us all about it.
As usual, moderation in this thread will be relatively non-existent -- jokes, anecdotes and light-hearted banter are welcome.
11 Answers 2019-04-26