Medieval is a wide term, but let's say XIII century England.
There is a popular depiction of street urchins stealing money - but obviously not all children can be thieves - especially the children of the middle-class inhabitants of the city. Would they play without fear in the streets with their peers, or were the local children restricted, say staying in the backyard, or never going away from someone supervising?
2 Answers 2015-06-02
1 Answers 2015-06-02
1 Answers 2015-06-02
1 Answers 2015-06-02
Is there any historical backing/evidence that Emperor Augustus' last words were "Acta est fabula, plaudite."/"The play is over, applaud."?
Pretty simple..
1 Answers 2015-06-02
It uses the Latin alphabet, and has a Latin-derived language. Why did the lands now in Romania end up with Constantinople rather than Rome?
1 Answers 2015-06-02
I was on /r/badhistory and I saw a post criticizing those who used Dan Carlin as a historical jumping-off point and talking about how his analysis of WWI is wrong. Why is this and why do some people not like him so much?
2 Answers 2015-06-02
If I was a civilian back home and had a big interest in the war, what would I be doing to keep tabs? Anything beyond the daily newspapers?
2 Answers 2015-06-02
I know that they had access to peppers in the Sichuan province, but other places also had access to peppers. If someone mentions Sichuan food, it's almost assumed that it's spicy.
2 Answers 2015-06-02
I found this article that would suggest so: http://articles.dailypress.com/2011-06-06/news/dp-nws-oped-duffus-0605-20110604_1_blackbeard-queen-anne-s-revenge-kenneth-kinkor
I saw the latter half of a black beard documentary like 2 or 3 years ago and it seemed to suggest that he'd capture and take over slaver ships and just leave the slaves with the boat and take the valubles and even recruit some of the slaves to his crew, never stating that he took the slaves as something to trade/sell.
So I'm wondering if they glossed over that to make him seem more like an anti-hero instead of a villain. I guess I shouldn't put it pass him to do that since he was a pirate that allowed his crew to rape and kill his wife after she embarrassed him in front of a couple of people (if the documentary I saw is even remotely truthful)
I tried so hard to find a pirate subreddit, like...an actual pirate one, but you can guess what I found instead. So i figured I'd ask some historians.
1 Answers 2015-06-02
It seems like these random executions could be carried out by even the lowest ranked soldiers. Did the commanders of these soldiers encourage acts like these or were there limits to when and where prisoners could be shot?
3 Answers 2015-06-02
1 Answers 2015-06-02
2 Answers 2015-06-02
1 Answers 2015-06-02
I'm not sure if this is more of a linguistics question, but since I got my degree in history, I wanted to ask my brethren/sistren first.
China has hundreds of dialects, and I know the Communist takeover after 1949 resulted in the development of simplified characters and standard learning of Mandarin Chinese throughout the country, but I've always wondered what the language landscape would have looked like in the warlord era and the 1930s, particularly among the various classes.
I would assume middle and upper classes would be more likely to speak multiple dialects due to increased education and greater travel outside of single provinces or regions. Would upper class or Nationalist leaders been more likely to use Cantonese or Mandarin for official business? What about Communist leaders?
My apologies if my western/American class divisions are not an appropriate way to classify Chinese social classes in this era.
1 Answers 2015-06-02
I remember reading that pirates normally sailed smaller ships, so getting into a firefight with a galleon would be unwise. What other methods would these pirates employ to capture large vessels?
1 Answers 2015-06-02
A friend asked for a history of the Spanish Civil War, and I don't see one in the book list. What are some good ones?
3 Answers 2015-06-02
Louis-Napoleon Bonaparte, Napoleon I's nephew, was elected President of France in 1848 and eventually crowned as Emperor of the French in 1852.
I'm currently reading Phantom Terror: Political Paranoia and the Creation of the Modern State, from Adam Zamoyski, which recounts (among other things) the state repression and paranoia for preventing a Bonapartist restoration in France and abroad during the early Restoration. It seems odd that the Great Powers would "allow" another Napoleon in the throne of France a barely generation after the Congress of Vienna.
1 Answers 2015-06-02
2 Answers 2015-06-02