When kings or other royalty participated in battles, would the enemy have been aware? Did a royal's presence affect battlefield tactics on either side?

by [deleted]

It seems to me that a king's presence on the battlefield would be a massive liability and not worth any moral boost it conferred, and yet there seem to be many important battles involving royalty. Was there an unspoken agreement not to gang up on royals or something along those lines? Was killing a king particularly rewarded? Really any sort of information would be interesting!

gingerkid1234

You may be interested in this section of the FAQ.