How likely is it that the rumors of the debauchery of Roman emperors such as Nero, Tiberius, or Caligula were not true, but rather colorful remarks and criticisms of their reigns by historians of the time?

by lieutenant_cthulhu
michaemoser

Lord Acton is quoted as having said "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men."; so I would tend to believe that these reports were true.

movingon11

I searched what I could on my phone, but could not find it. Can somebody run a search for a question posted a while back about Nero? I remember someone gave a rather detailed explanation of how Nero may have been ruined by writers after the fact, and was actually not as evil as he was written out to be.

OP, I would direct you to search for that particular response. It's quite the task, and I can only direct you to a post that was about Nero and possibly included fiddles. I'll keep looking once I get home, because I feel that response really fits what you're looking for.