We have covered this from a number of different angles in the past if you're interested.

The short answer is that there is little to no evidence from the Egyptian side. I've written about about why that might be via Kitchen on this.

It all depends on whether you take the Exodus account as being 'literal' or a synthesis of a number of different exoduses, or a fake story made up later on.

If you take it as literal, then you're pretty much on your own with people such as Bryant Wood here is an example. He and Douglas Petrovich find the evidence in Egypt but they do this against everybody else.

The second option is that it's a number of different exoduses - people wandered back and forth from Canaan to Egypt, slaves did try to escape Egypt, and so the Exodus story is a combination of a number of those stories put together.

The third option is that it's made up, in which case all enquiry stops. Not only is that boring, but it also requires explaining why so much of the bible refers to something fictitious (starting with Hosea in the 8th century).