I have a regular knowledge of latin, along with a Latin I textbook. (Cambridge latin course) How far back in time could I go and still be understood. Assume I can both speak and write conversational latin.

by kietram
talondearg

I don't know what you mean by "a regular knowledge", nor why you are taking a Latin I textbook with you, but assuming you had a classical pronunciation scheme and could speak and write conversational Latin, I think you could get back to the 2nd or 3rd centuries BC. Classical writers in the 1st century BC show an awareness of "early latin" - words, spelling, and phraseology that seems "antique" to them, but it never presents them with any problems of understanding. But Polybius does mention reading a treaty from 452 BC that was quite difficult for him to understand, so I think much past the 300s and you will run into real difficulty.

Parokki

This has actually been asked and answered quite well at least once before.

http://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/11ki3i/lets_say_i_master_latin_today_and_i_get_in_a_time/

[deleted]

One of the points which has not been brought up by the other two excellent answers is that it's also not a direct line back which correlates with time. You would have a much more difficult time being understood in the 6-8th c.s than you would in classical Rome.