What would have the tattoos of the real Norse looked like?

by KatsumotoKurier

When I was watching a BBC series The Vikings: Who were they? (first episode here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsX7i5BCHso) in one of the episodes, the host reads from Arabic documentation from the 1300s that the Norse indeed did have tattoos on their bodies.

Now, regarding the popular television series Vikings, that show prides itself on historical, although fictional accuracy. Here is an example of one of the tattooed characters, Jarl Borg. http://25.media.tumblr.com/754488c3dd332481b1641a691e947e3b/tumblr_my6iqbt3321s7xoeto1_500.png

Are these tattoos accurate? Is there real proof these peoples were ones to tattoo themselves? How did they, if they did?

Freevoulous

Ibn Fadlan account describes their tattoos as reminding of pine trees and vines.

As an archeologist specialising in early Medieval Europe, I encoutered several artistic motiffs that crop most often among the Norse, Pomeranians and Northern Slavs.

That would be:

The same motiffs range from the Vendel Period to the post-christianisation of Scandinavia, and from Lapland to Normandy, and appear on pottery, leather, jewelery, weapons, tools, engravings, and virtually everywhere (the northmen had a thing for decoration apparently). While we do not have any evidence that the Northmen of Viking Era tattoed themselves, we have clues, namely:

  • the proliferation of decorative motiffs on anything they owned.
  • the popularity of religious tattoos among their neighbours, the Saami (Laplanders), with which they intermarried (this is well discussed in another thread on r/askhistorians)
  • the fact that through out the ages, sailors were the main "carriers" of tattoos, and the Northmen of Viking Period were consumate sailors and travelers.

So in essence, we do not know if "Vikings" had tattoos, but the re are good clues that they did, and IF they did, that it was a combination of geometric motiffs, braided/knotted lines, floral motiffs, religious symbols, runes, and possibly animal motiffs (horses, dragons etc).

Source: Im an archeologist who excavated viking burial sites in Pomerania and Masovia.

EDIT: formatting.

kwyjiboner

The Norse actually didn't really have tattoos.

I assume that the "Arabic documentation" that you're referring to is the account of Ibn Fadlan in the 10th century. He apparently met with Rus traders who were "as tall as date trees", "combed their hair daily" and were covered, basically head to toe, in tree like patterns and other figures of dark green or blue/black.

Unfortunately a search of Norse/Viking tattoos always goes back to Ibn Fadlan's account, which leads me to believe that if the Norse people did practice tattooing, it was far from common.