I was taking a gander over at the Wikipedia aggregate rankings of presidents and I noticed that Richard Nixon as next to the like of Hoover, Coolidge and Bush II. I understand why he would be rated at that level, Watergate being the biggest presidential scandal in history, I am wondering whether his many foreign and domestic accomplishments (China, EPA, SALT, OSHA etc.) make him deserving of better.
I realize this is used as one of the examples in the question guide but as far as I can tell it hasn't actually been asked yet. If I am mistaken, my apologies.
This was asked literally [yesterday] (http://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/20iqrh/was_nixon_really_as_bad_a_guy_as_everyone_seems/)