I heard somewhere that the weapon of choice for priests was the mace as it did not draw blood, is there any credible backing for this statement?
Priests are, as this myth rightly says, prohibited from the shedding of blood. However, there are quite a few Church canons specifically prohibiting clerical participation in warfare.
This is not to say it didn't happen - La Chanson de Roland has Bishop Turpin in full armor, and the frequent repetition of canonical decrees is usually inferred to mean the existing rules are probably being disobeyed - but in that case there would be no particular need to restrict oneself to a mace.
So yeah, just another medievalism.
The Knights Templar were originally a monastic order, though not priests per se, and I can't find any evidence that the chaplains actually fought.
There is, however, evidence of 'war clerics' like those you're probably thinking of. The Bayeux Tapestry depicts a Norman Priest wielding a mace - Bishop Odo of Bayeux. It's a theme that stretches through much of Scandinavia and those of Scandinavian descent. Bishop Absalon of Roskilde led a military campaign against the Wends of Eastern Germany.