Academics on this sub: For your 'intro' (i.e. your "101" classes) what do you think the focus of the classes should be?

by ccbrownsfan

I'm curious as to the general philosophy behind teaching intro classes. Are 'themes' and general ideas and threads throughout history more important, or are specifics (dates, names, battles, etc.) more important?

Obviously both are extremely important to understanding history, but for a one semester class that contains a significant population of students that will never take another history course, what do you think that it is crucial to focus on? What do you do with such a limited time-frame to help students have a fuller understanding of history?

VermeersHat

This is a vague question, so I hope it's appropriate to response with a vague answer: regardless of the topic, I think it's important to structure introductory classes around helping students understand what history is and how it's done. For whatever reason, the idea that historians are drones who memorize dates and solidify consensus seems to have taken a real hold -- at least in the United States. Of course, that's not what historians do at all. We read sources, weigh interpretations, consider narrative frames, engage communities, and argue with one another. History is something that's done, not something that is. If I can help students engage in the process of making history (or at least help them understand the ways in which history is made) hopefully that can give them a critical eye to other kinds of history-making they'll encounter in the future.