Assuming the hunting traditions in place in the early 1600s are any indication, no. Hunting was an essential economic activity, not a leisurely pastime as Europeans regarded it. This difference in perspective prompted the erroneous colonial stereotype that Native men were lazy, spending their days entertaining themselves with the chase like the noblemen of Europe, while their women were enslaved to do all the real work (ie, farming).

Additionally, in the indigenous philosophy of the region, animals aren't view as subordinate to humans as they were by Europeans (whose Christian religion permitted them to subdue the earth and have dominion over all living things). Plants and animals are instead co-equal members of Creation, essentially they're types of other-than-human people. Every living thing has its role to play, and sometimes that role is to be food or to provide its fur for clothing. At such times, the animal is to be treated respectfully and thanked for its sacrifice. To kill without need would be regarded as immoral.

Sources

Same as in this post