During the Anglo-Saxon Heptarchy, kingdoms waged wars on eachother, not for conquest, but for "dominance". What does that mean exactly?

by [deleted]

By "the Heptarchy" I mean the petty kingdoms in the British isles around the time period of 500-800. At the time Britain was divided into about a dozen little kingdoms that often waged war on eachother. However, none of them were strong enough to unite the whole island or, or often even to conquer their neighbours. It's often stated that the wargoals of these conflicts weren't to outright destroy or annex enemy kingdoms, but to "dominate" them. I have trouble wrapping my head around what that concept means. Perhaps it's because I'm used to modern wars being about annexing territory or "uniting" an area under one's own state. However, the British and Anglo-Saxon kingdoms often won wars without any changes to the borders. What exactly were they fighting about then? What was the goal of the wars?

Bonus question: I've read somewhere that there was a custom among some of the kingdoms called the "king's raid" or some such, supposedly it was expected of new kings to attack a neighbouring kingdom upon their accession to the throne, as a tradition. Is there any truth to that?

Thanks in advance for answering my questions!

Flubb

Do you have a source for any of this? The only thing I can marry with the idea is the idea of overlordship where the more powerful overlords (such Aethelberht, Oswald, Osimiu, Ecgfrith) would force tribute and court attendance to the weaker kings (Eowa, Wulfhere) - is that what you mean? There were border changes - the Northumbrians pushed North and west towards the Irish sea, and the Mercians annexed the Hwicce, Lindsey, Sussex, Kent, and Essex.

The 'King's Raid' (crech rig) is an Irish concept not an AS one (as far as I know), and was primarily cattle-raiding. Paidrig o Riain is the main author on that ('The "crech rig" or "royal prey"', Eisge XV) but I can't find a free version of that for you.