This week, ending in May 29th, 2014:
Today's thread is for open discussion of:
History in the academy
Historiographical disputes, debates and rivalries
Implications of historical theory both abstractly and in application
Philosophy of history
And so on
Regular participants in the Thursday threads should just keep doing what they've been doing; newcomers should take notice that this thread is meant for open discussion only of matters like those above, not just anything you like -- we'll have a thread on Friday for that, as usual.
I had asked this earlier in the week without much success, so I might as well try again here.
What are your thoughts on the works of Ryszard Kapuściński? I happened to pick up a second-hand copy of his The Shadow of the Sun the other day, which is an account of his experience covering certain de-/post-colonization moments in a variety of African nations. The work seems to be very well-reviewed, and I've been enjoying it so far -- but it's very far out of my field, and I am curious as to his (or even just the book's) reputation as far as these subjects go. He seems to have written several books about African matters, including a biography of sorts of the Ethiopian Emperor Haile Selassie that I'd also like to check out.
But before I do that... what do you think?
For a history writing question: One of the things I sometimes notice is that it seems that over the decades transliteration conventions are growing more and more literal--I am even seeing more often the appearance of the dreaded Thoukydides. This even changes the pronunciation significantly, such as the transformation of Montezuma into Moctezuma. It is a process that, as far as I can tell, really only occurs in English (German and French, for example, still uses Peking/Pekin) and it is one I have some trouble justifying to myself. I understand the appeal of getting close to the "accurate" pronunciation, but shouldn't more deference be paid to convention and, more importantly, what sounds natural to the English tongue?
I am curious what people who have some familiarity feel about this--this is really just my perception.
I asked this once before and still don't understand. What is history in the academy.