Precisely Recorded Events

by centerde
TheophrastusBmbastus

What a terrific question! To answer it, one has to look to the history of time and timekeeping itself; after all, the notion that there is an "exact minute," and the technological, social, bureaucratic systems which supported exact timekeeping, are relatively modern.

Consider, for a moment, the world before standardized time and before accurate mechanical clocks. The day began at sunrise and ended at sunset. Noon was the moment when the sun passed highest over your village. Town bells or criers synchronized civic life, but otherwise the notion that you could be ‘two minutes late’ or that the workday lasts exactly eight hours simply did not exist. In that world, ‘the exact minute’ would have been a nonsense phrase. But you know that, hence your question!

Astronomers were, almost certainly, among the first to record events with that level of precision. Observatories, such as the Royal Observatory in Greenwich, set standard times and recorded the exact minutes of high and low tides, high noon, the phases of the moon, the meridian transits of stars, etc, in order to develop accurate timekeeping and calendric practices for navigation. Accordingly, the most accurate clocks were often found in centres of astronomy such as these, where precise measurement of astronomical phenomena was key. The first events measured precisely across several spaces were probably eclipses and transits. These phenomena were useful precisely because they happened at a discrete moment in time, could be seen simultaneously from several different places on earth, and thus could be used as timekeeping tools themselves. As early as the 17th century, observers like James Gregory suggested that simultaneous measurements of transits, taken from different points on Earth, could be used to measure astronomical distances. Governments eventually acted on the idea; the transit of Venus in 1769, for example, was observed simultaneously in Tahiti, the Americas, and Europe. As astronomy developed, however, more and more precise measurements were required and the science developed elaborate technological and cultural solutions.

However, those astronomical events were recorded exactly because the events themselves were thought of as occurring in their own precise, absolute time. In a sense, they calibrated the clocks, not the other way around. It wasn’t until the late 19th century that European governments imposed their own rigid chronological regimes. However, the advent of the railroad, telegraphy, and a ‘shrinking world’ of more closely intertwined commerce and communication demanded the creation of standard and exact international timekeeping. Railroads and national governments created a number of schemes for standardizing time across large spaces throughout the mid 19th century. By 1884, many national governments agreed to a set of standard timezones centred on a prime meridian through the Royal Observatory in Greenwich. Now the world had a standard time, and an ‘exact minute’ meant the same thing no matter where you were.

Now, when an event happened, it could be recorded as happening at a precise minute – a minute that was legible, meaningful, and standard for everyone on earth. There were surely others before it, but intellectual historian Stephen Kern points to the sinking of the Titanic as the first truly ‘simultaneous event’ in that, thanks to wireless communications, the exact chronology of its sinking was understood – and it was a chronology the entire world read about in newspapers the next day. That is to say, the titanic sunk at the exact same time to everyone in the entire world, and so transcended space itself.

So, I guess in a way it depends on one’s definitions, as so many answers in history usually do. Call it petty, fuzzy evasion if you like—it is—but one hopes that in sorting that sort of thing out, one also disentangles some thread of meaning from a wild, jumbled past, too. I’m also sure others could add something more substantive here. What are some contenders for (non-astronomical) 19th-century events that meet the criteria OP describes? I doubt very seriously there is one discrete answer; probably there are tens of thousands recorded with increasing degrees of precision over time.

EDIT: minor spelling errors

gingerkid1234

Sorry, we don't allow throughout history questions. These tend to produce threads which are collections of trivia, not the in-depth discussions about a particular topic we're looking for. If you have a specific question about a historical event or period or person, please feel free to re-compose your question and submit it again. Alternatively, you may PM /u/caffarelli to have your question considered for an upcoming Tuesday Trivia thread.