How big of a deal were militant groups like the Black Panther party (as well as others) during the 60's? Did they ever pose a legitimate threat to the U.S.? Also, how wide spread was this sort of militant/aggressive (as opposed to nonviolent) activism amongst civil rights groups/activists?
They were a big deal in a handful of American cities, but at their peak they only few thousand members. I don't think you can characterize them as a threat to the U.S., and that was never their goal, their goal was self defense, freedom from racist systems that existed in America and education for the black community that they felt was being terrorized by the establishment. Here is their 10 Point Program that explains what they wanted:
The Panther's demanded their Constitutional rights. They were not trying to overthrow the system. They exercised their Constitutional right to bear arms and enraged police forces by stopping to observe arrests of blacks to make sure that the police followed proper procedures. They went so far as to carry copies of the law to show police who challenged them that they were within their rights to do what were doing. This type of stuff and other things eventually lead to them being illegally harassed, spied upon and in some cases assassinated by the FBI under J. Edgar Hoover.
The greatest impact that the Black Panther Party had on the civil rights movement was to provide what the establishment saw as a scary militant, alternative to the non-violent tactics of people like Martin Luther King Jr.
Despite their sometimes Marxist rhetoric, the Black Panthers were as American as apple pie and were willing to use violence to get the rights that they were promised under the Constitution.
I highly recommend David Hillard's book "This Side of Glory: The Autobiography of David Hilliard and the Story of the Black Panther Party" if you want to understand the motivations and aims of the Black Panther Party.