What went wrong on the supply and logistical side of the campaign?
Why did the Grand Armee's numbers dwindle so much early in the campaign?
Why did Napoleon/his subordinates fail to trap/destroy/bring to battle the Russian armies?
What's the truth in Napoleon refusing to commit the guard at Borodino, would it likely have broken the Russian army?
Since no one else was answering.
But that is not to say that was the only thing they did. Most infamously, under Bagration, the Russians also started using Partisans, or citizens militia, who would attack French supply lines and even occasionally skirmished with them (kinda like the Soviet policy of deep battle doctrine). Bagration went on to create the first manual on how to conduct guerrilla warfare.
1.Napoleons army had to rely on foraging. This was made almost impossible because the Russians destroyed most of the crops and took the live stock.
2.The summer heat and the long periods of marching was one of the leading causes for most of the loses during the early days of the invasion.
3.Napoleons plan at borodino was not brilliant. It was basically a frontal assault. This made it easy for the Russians to escape. Napoleon also did not know the exact strength of the Russians so he did not bother to chase them.
4.Regarding the the old guard Napoleon did not know the enemy strength so he did not want to risk his guard going into a trap. It's hard to say if it would of broken the Russians or not .
hi! not discouraging further responses, but you may be interested in these similar posts:
general:
thread in AMA on the Napoleonic Wars
questions about winter/weather:
Was it really the Russian Winter that stopped Napoleon and Hitler's invasions?
Did Napoleon and the Nazis face winters of historic harshness in 1812-13 and 1941-42?
scorched earth tactics: