Looking at the evolution of Council of Clermont, Lateran IV, and Romanus Pontifex, can the Kingdom of Jerusalem be considered a European colony?

by [deleted]
Gimpalong

That the Crusader kingdoms in the Levant were essentially European (primarily French) colonies is the central thesis of Prawer's Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem: European Colonialism in the Middle Ages" (1973).

Not sure if this is against the rules, but here's an interesting discussion on the topic:

http://parablemania.ektopos.com/archives/2010/09/crusade-colonies.html