Your premise is problematic because it's an example of presentism — i.e. an anachronistic interpretation of history which relies on modern concepts, values, terminology, etc. Specifically: the definitions of 'conservative' and 'liberal' vary wildly over time; they're heavily contingent on contemporary context.
Here's a pretty good essay by a former president of the American Historical Association on the dangers of presentism:
Presentism, at its worst, encourages a kind of moral complacency and self-congratulation. Interpreting the past in terms of present concerns usually leads us to find ourselves morally superior; the Greeks had slavery, even David Hume was a racist, and European women endorsed imperial ventures. Our forbears constantly fail to measure up to our present-day standards. This is not to say that any of these findings are irrelevant or that we should endorse an entirely relativist point of view.
So, for example: the use of the term 'liberal' in US political parlance as essentially a synonym for 'left-wing' is deeply flawed. That conceptualisation of American liberalism is a very different beast to the classical liberalism of John Locke. The conservatism of Edmund Burke isn't that of the modern American conservative movement.
There's also the problem of identity politics: we talk about 'social liberalism' as a discrete quality, but we're actually talking in general terms about attitudes to many different issues: gender, race, class, sexual orientation. Many of these historical 'social liberal' champions — from Wilberforce to Lincoln to Martin Luther King — may be iconic in their attitudes to one group, and decidedly lacking by modern standards in their views on another. Take George Washington: he fought a war in the name of American liberty, but he was also a major slaveowner.
The point is that making those judgements based on modern standards and concepts is a bad idea, because it tends to distort our view of history, not clarify it.
Sorry, we don't allow throughout history questions. These tend to produce threads which are collections of trivia, not the in-depth discussions about a particular topic we're looking for. If you have a specific question about a historical event or period or person, please feel free to re-compose your question and submit it again. Alternatively, you may PM /u/caffarelli to have your question considered for an upcoming Tuesday Trivia thread.