What are some of the greatest imbalances between modes of warfare in history?

by [deleted]
Brrieck

Well I would say that the colonial conquests of Africa and America are a good example, though it varies, early on, there was more of a match. Guerilla tactics and fact that the only reason for early muskets was because it's easier to train gunpowder weapons, even though early ones were inaccurate hand-cannons with a likeliness of explosions. But of course, the colonial powers had access to other things like cannons and good steel. In Africa, the fact that it was closer and had more access to the trade routes of Europe and the Middle East meant that they were not as technologically deficient as the First Peoples in America, but even with the more advanced tech, the main success against early colonial attempts were disease and guerilla warfare. This is why it's sparsely colonized and was mostly beneficial as trading posts until the 1800s when better weapons and medical techniques were discovered.

Georgy_K_Zhukov

Sorry, we don't allow throughout history questions. These tend to produce threads which are collections of trivia, not the in-depth discussions about a particular topic we're looking for. If you have a specific question about a historical event or period or person, please feel free to re-compose your question and submit it again. Alternatively, you may PM /u/caffarelli to have your question considered for an upcoming Tuesday Trivia thread.