What made navies so different from land armies in the years of Ancient Greece and Rome?

by bulldog89

around the years 500-300bc or so, what was the benefit of having soldiers suited to marine battles than land battles? With the ships of that time wouldn't they only need to simply steer and launch missiles? Would a regular soldiers easily be able to be adapted into a fleet?

Edit: words

EmperorOfMeow

Well, Romans being unaccustomed to and uncomfortable with naval warfare went as far as to invent and deploy corvus to make naval battles as landlike as possible, with typical land soldiers and all.

Athenian marines on the other hand were highly trained for combat at seas and specialized in boarding.

In Greece especially, preferences differed. Some states favored boarding, while others relied on speed and maneuverability of their ships to sink the enemy.

There's also a limit to what a missile can do. Ramming other ships is generally much more effective.

You might be interested in reading Ships and Seamanship in the Ancient World and other books by Lionel Casson.