This article (in french), when translated seems to contradict our understanding of Auschwitz history. I know the context and that the data can be tracked back to verifiable primary sources... And admissions... But I am having a hard time accepting it. Could someone please explain? Thanks, 10/32rackscews.
It doesn't contradict anything. What are you finding hard to accept in the article? Everything in there is standard history.
I read it--I know French. I don't see anything in there controversial or contradicting established facts. Do you know French or did you use google translate?