Is the official 'lone gunman' theory about JFK's assassination generally accepted by historians?

by [deleted]

I'm not that well-versed in the JFK assassination, but I do know there seems to be a lot of dispute about the Warren Commission's official account. Do the alternative scenarios hold any water?

Are the 'multiple gunmen' theories actually considered credible (or even likely) by historians, or are they simply a cultural phenomenon, and fun to speculate about due to the huge amount of attention surrounding the event?

smokersdieolder

Previous discussion here and here.

Short answer: it is generally accepted that Oswald killed JFK (there is little evidence otherwise), but his motives are mostly unknown. Though I would recommend just reading those threads.

Edit: Added another link.