Day of Reflection | September 22, 2014–September 28, 2014

by AutoModerator

Previous

Today:

Welcome to this week's instalment of /r/AskHistorians' Day of Reflection. Nobody can read everything that appears here each day, so in this thread we invite you to share anything you'd like to highlight from the last week - an interesting discussion, an informative answer, an insightful question that was overlooked, or anything else.

yodatsracist

These aren't from this week, but I have a bunch from the two months or so that I've never had time on a Sunday to post:

As a reminder for anyone who has gold: it's really easy to create a "day of" category in your saved comments. That's what I do, and then when I have a stress free Sunday, I just can really easily lay them all out.

texpeare

The big standout of the week for me was our own /u/tiako giving an AMA on The Economy of the Ancient Roman Empire.

nlcund

I was mildly disappointed that some child's question about why Americans use "cheap" building materials (compared to European timber framing) was deleted. I found a quick summary of American innovations in wooden construction, and I'm digging up some vaguely remembered reads.

If anyone's interested, here they are:

Advanced Framing uses a diagram of the Illinois Cottage at the Paris Exhibition of 1867 as an example of early efficient stick framing. However I can't find that image in the book cited. Edit: While scrolling through an image search, I have randomly run across it in the Chicago Public Library Blog; it's from a book from 1857.

A historical survey of wall framing by the same author.

I was unable to find any other images of the Illinois Cottage except this one; its exterior looks a bit more elaborate than the simple framing suggests.

Also, this paper that I'm too cheap to pay for, but it gives some background on how basic rural dwellings were thought to be better in America than in Europe at the time, to the point of being worth exhibiting.

TheGreenReaper7

I'm going to breach the unspoken taboo by putting a question forward which I thoroughly enjoyed answering. There are just so many fantastically problematic concepts in the linked article because it is drawn from the polemical and teleological concepts of turn of the (twentieth) century 'historiography'. Anyway I offer it here in the hope that others might also wonder upon the sheer audacity of the attempted hatchet-job by Irene Beaudry in LaRouche's expensive tinfoil rag the Executive Intelligence (oxymoronic) Review.