Are there any instances of successful historical revisionism, in which we've been left with known falsified historical accounts and insufficient records to discern the truth?

by Dirkef88
AbouBenAdhem

One of the main sources for Roman history in the second and third centuries is the Historia Augusta—which claims to be a collection of works by several third century historians, but is now thought to be a piece of historical fiction written about a century later. However, the unknown author evidently used a lot of reference works that have since been lost, so it’s assumed that the Historia contains a good deal of true and otherwise unknown information in spite of being fiction.