Since they're all too old to comment on, I'll follow up by asking the opposite question - do I recall correctly one of the Georges (II?) being accused of using British blood and treasure to defend his Hanoverian possessions against the will of the people?

You may find these previous threads useful

http://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/1ugjp8/how_integrated_was_hanover_with_britain_during/

http://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/1u088e/how_much_of_an_impact_did_the_personal_union/

Bonus thread on when Great Britain and the Netherlands were ruled by the same Monarch but were still separate States

http://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/2ffu86/could_england_scotland_and_netherlands_ever_be/