This submission has been removed because it is soapboxing, promotion of a political agenda, or moralizing. We don't allow content that does these things because they are detrimental to unbiased and academic discussion of history.

"What is the earliest history we can trace the source of the Bible?" is fine, so if you want to resubmit just that, please feel free. But appending "and why does its truth seem so viable yet so farfetched?" is a very leading prompt and is not the type of question we like to see here. If you can think of a way of rephrasing it to avoid that though, you can include it (I'm not clear on what you are hoping for exactly, but perhaps along the lines of "How much of the Old Testament has been corroborated by other sources and archaeological evidence?")