In the 20th century, when cities would "clean up their streets" of crime, was there is a net decrease in crime overall, or did criminals simply operate elsewhere?

by Notmiefault

I'm thinking primarily in major US cities, but really this can apply to anywhere. What does "urban renewal" actually do?

I realize this is kind of a broad question; feel free to provide specific examples and answer more narrowly than the question suggests.

MrDowntown

"Urban renewal" programs weren't primarily about crime or social indicators, but merely about clearing the blighted buildings and neighborhoods (where crimes such as prostitution or public drinking often flourished), making large areas of land available for modern development projects that would rejuvenate the cities. The idea seemed reasonable, if audacious, at the time, when US cities suffered from unhealthy overcrowding, and many urban dwellings even lacked sanitary facilities. Alas, even the best-laid plans often go astray, and the relocation assistance for those displaced by the land clearance was nonexistent or inadequate, the social networks of the displaced neighborhoods were overlooked or dismissed, and relocation housing was slow in coming.