I am a medieval lord who has just accepted the king's invitation to accompany him on a boar hunt. What happens now? What would a 'typical' wild boar hunt have been like?

by Hezekiah_the_Judean

Just what the title says. I'm wondering how a 'normal' wild boar hunt would have proceeded, how dangerous it would have been, and whether the hunters were usually successful in killing their quarry.

Edit: To be more specific, suppose that I am a French noble during the 1400s.

mormengil

Before the day of the Royal Hunt, the huntsmen would have taken their lymers (a type of dog valued for scenting skills) and scouted the terrain, hoping to find where game might be located. The lymers were on long leashes, and trained to be silent. Their purpose was to detect the whereabouts of quarry so the hunt could be planned. This preparation for the hunt was called “the Quest”.

On the day of the hunt, the hunting party and any spectators planning to ride along would gather at breakfast. The huntsman would explain the terrain and what game had been detected in the area. The hunt would be planned. This was called “The Assembly”.

Relays of dogs would be positioned in places where the quarry might run, so that fresh dogs could take up the chase if necessary. These dogs might be a mix of scent hounds (known as “running hounds” –somewhat resembling modern foxhounds) and sight hounds (usually “alaunts”, if the quarry was boar – this was a breed of dog resembling a greyhound (greyhounds were used for smaller and less dangerous quarry) but larger and more robust).

The hunting party would station itself in a central location (or several) to wait for the chase to begin.

The quarry would be found (usually by lymers catching the scent) and then chased, by releasing the nearest dogs to track and harry it. Once the dogs were on the scent, the mounted hunting party would follow the chase. The hunters would generally be mounted on “coursers”, a breed of horse smaller, and more agile than “destriers”, or war horses.

The chase could last a while, or could split the hunting party in different directions if a “sounder” (herd) of boar had been found and then split up. Additional groups of the dogs, which had been previously positioned, could be released if the original dogs tired, or parts of the sounder fled in different directions.

When the quarry was surrounded or tired it would turn “at bay”. The hounds would bay frantically and attempt to attack or contain the boar. Members of the hunting party who had managed to stay close to the chase would ride as fast as they could to attempt to reach the scene before too many dogs were killed or injured or the quarry broke out to run again.

There were many ways to try to kill the boar, including bows and crossbows, spears from horseback, but in the most formal and ritualistic hunts (which a royal hunt was likely to be – known as hunting “par force”) it was customary for the most prominent man in the immediate hunting party which had come upon the quarry at bay to dismount and attempt to kill the boar with a spear or sword.

The “boar spear” might have been the most common weapon used when hunting boar. This was a spear with a cross-guard on the shaft (to prevent a speared boar from charging up the spear shaft and mauling the hunter even as it died). Using a sword was much more dangerous to the hunter, but it was sometimes done.

Here is a description in verse (from “Sir Gawain and the Green Knight”) of the finish of a boar hunt (the boar is at bay in a stream) by Lord Bercilak with a sword:

The swine springs out swiftly, straight at the lord,

           So that the brave one and the boar were both locked together
           In the wildest current of the water; the worst had that other,
           For the man marks him well when they met at first,
           Set surely the sharp sword straight in the slot, 
           Shoved it up to the hilts, so that the heart split,
           And he, with frantic yowling, yielded and floated downstream, 
                 in fright.	
           A hundred hounds amassed;	
           That beast they then did bite.	
           On the field the creature was cast,	
           And dogs slew him on that site.           (Sir Gawain 1589-1600)

Boar hunting was dangerous. King Philip IV of France, for example, died from falling off his horse when he was charged by a boar. Hunting “par force” was more dangerous than other forms of hunting boar, and hunting “par force” with a sword instead of a boar spear was even more dangerous. Still, boar hunting was undoubtedly far more dangerous for the boar than it was for the hunters.

Sources: http://www.ripleyonline.com/Under%20Discussion/hunt/med_hunt.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_hunting

keyilan

This is a reminder to only post comments that you could back up with sources if asked. Do not leave speculative replies.

All comments which violate the subreddit rules have been removed and will continue to be removed.

bavarian82

Follow up question - how dangerous was such a hunt, were hunters frequently killed by their prey or fellow hunters?