I've encountered some debate on whether this is an accurate portrayal of the era. To me it seems more of an exaggerated image of the socio-economic change at the time and more of a result of post-Tudor literature. However, I could easily be wrong, since massive social change of that sort in a short amount of time isn't totally out of the question.
So basically, would it be proper to characterize the Tudor period as embodying those societal changes?
Are the words "aristocracy" and "gentry" not synonymous?