I'm the 3rd son of the 3rd son of the 3rd son of an earl in 16th century England. Am I still a member of the gentry, or would I be a farmer or tradesmen living hand to mouth like any other commoner?

by TheEmperorsNewHose

From reading up on the subject a bit I've learned that the non-inheriting children of the nobility would often become either soldiers or members of the clergy, both of which limit their chances to have legitimate children, but obviously a great number of them would choose neither, marry, and have children, to whom the "soldier or clergy" career paths would also prevail - but again, a great number of them would choose neither, marry, and have children. Basically what I want to know is how many generations would it take before your noble blood was essentially irrelevant?

Also - I'm aware that if non-inheriting sons enjoyed any degree of military or civic success, many of them would be created nobles in their own right, but for the purposes of this question I want to exclude them.

iwinagin

I'm afraid you are simply out on your keister. Even if you were the first son of the third son you'd be out of luck. Your grandfather as the son of an earl would be referred to as "the honorable" when addressed in the third person but he wouldn't actually have any special rights or privileges otherwise.

I found a wonderful website where you can read up on courtesy titles