i would at the very least crosspost this to r/asksocialscience.

I am not sure what you are asking, precisely. If you are talking about the role of women in society, particularly being pushed out of the avenues of power, then no.

We have pretty good evidence that political and spiritual power in early cities in Mesopotamia were at least partly shared between men and women, with women having at least nominal positions of power if not authority. Women, far before this, often played integral roles in the spiritual side of society, and this was the role they appeared to play in the Sumerian states. However, the role of men in the armed services likely led to the dual leadership nature of these early cities being abandoned in favour of monopolization around a single powerful figure, the man.

I'd say the main 'contribution' of Judiasism and it's descendents has been the elimination of the female role in religious practices. While religious roles certainly offered women a placement of security and likely at least modest wealth and security (and indeed, were often a patronage post for esteemed women in the ancient world), I am not sure it's fair to characterize these are positions of power or authority. Indeed, there's an argument to be made that Abrahamic religions generally merely codified already existent cultural norms. Powerful women continued to exist outside those norms, perhaps with added barriers no doubt, but I don't think there's any evidence that those norms had their origin in Abrahamic religions.

I'd like to ask you a question about your question if you don't mind ... By "modern result of gender bias" you mean the differences in salary between men and women, the difficulty for women to climb the social ladder, etc. ?