Generally speaking, yes.
Consider what the art of translation involves: a combination of at least 3 things:
As for 1, in the case of some ancient languages, our knowledge is at this point only increasing. Perhaps at some past point, our predecessors had superior knowledge of the source languages, but we are definitely past that point for, say, Ancient Greek or Latin. The age of the computer coupled with corpus analysis and modern linguistics has allowed us a better understanding of those languages all round, and a scholar in such a field can increase their knowledge in element 1.
As for element 2, an older translation may be good, reliable, accurate, and suited for its time. But as, for example, English moves on, translations need to be made anew. While I can read and understand an 18th century translation, I don't normally and naturally communicate in 18th century English. I speak 21st century English. A translation that is more recent will attempt to do that.
As for the last point, I think this varies. Translation is as much skill and art as it ever were science, and despite the field of Translation Studies, I'm not sure translators as a group are becoming especially more skilled at translating. However, with points 1 and 2, you can see why in fields like Classics and similar historical fields, more recent translations are generally preferable and superior.