Was there a certain process to their warfare?
If we're sticking to the Roman Kingdom, they didn't really conquer anyone. The Roman Kingdom was extremely small, and seen by contemporaries as essentially just another city-state. They fought as hoplites in a phalanx, and their wars were equally small-scale - think cattle rustling and responding to cattle rustling. Each side would form up, fight a little war, the winner would get the spoils, and a peace would be formed. According to Livy, the Romans basically won all of their battles, but this area of Roman history is heavily shrouded in myth and legend. There's very little known about this time period, sadly, but the most major military development (probably) was the introduction/solidification of the social strata along class (wealth) lines by the sixth king, Servius Tullius.
| Class | Property in Asses (bronze coin) | Expected Equipment | Junior Centuries | Senior Centuries | Total centuries |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | 100,000 | Helmet, round shield, greaves, cuirass, spear, sword | 40 | 40 | 80 |
| II | 75,000 | Helmet, oblong shield, greaves, spear, sword | 10 | 10 | 20 |
| III | 50,000 | Helmet, oblong shield, spear, sword | 10 | 10 | 20 |
| IV | 25,000 | Light shield, spear, javelin | 10 | 10 | 20 |
| V | 11,000 | Sling, stones, possibly javelin | 15 | 15 | 30 |
There were also “supernumerary” centuries, which were outside of the above class system:
Soldiers provided own equipment, especially in the first 500 years of Roman history. Things begin to get murky in the Punic Wars due to massive losses of manpower, but having weapons and being able to provide them in service to the state was a mark of pride for many Roman families. It was their way of showing how they not only lived in the City, but truly were willing to fight to defend their homes.
One final note: The centuries didn't have a specified number of people in each. The lower centuries always had a ton more people in them than the "higher" ones.