Why were the European countries so technologically advanced compared to all other countries?

by TheManeEvent101

Every time you talk about colonies and imperialism the European country always completely decimates the natives almost completely because they had better weapons. How is it that Europe was able to advance so far in terms of technology while the rest of the world made hardly any advancements at all?

OldWorldGlory

While you wait for more targeted answers, here are some threads on how non-European powers progressed technologically in the Early Modern and Modern eras:

China and Japan

The Americas

Africa

  • Why were there so few empires in Africa?
  • The answers in this thread correct the OP's assertion by pointing out various empires that developed (and collapsed) throughout Africa.
  • What happened to Africa's Ancient Empires?
  • The respondents go into the fates of several medieval and early modern African Empires as well as the difficulties of African history (often in finding evidence).
  • Why did all of the other continents develop so much quicker than Africa?
  • This is a large thread that not only talks about the African experience with "development" but also has several commenters highlighting the situations in the Americas and Australia. /u/khosikulu's comment here is an excellent analysis of African geography in context with its "development" and other issues that are commonly cited when comparing African peoples to others.