Why did Mexico ban foreigners from owning property (per their Constitution)?

by untaken-username

Article 27 of the Mexican Constitution prohibits foreigners from owning certain types of property:

Under no circumstances may foreigners acquire direct ownership of lands or waters within a zone of one hundred kilometers along the frontiers and of fifty kilometers along the shores of the country.

http://www.latinamericanstudies.org/mexico/1917-Constitution.htm

What were the contributing factors for including this particular clause in Article 27?

AshkenazeeYankee

My understanding is that this was intended to prevent "creeping Americanization" where American companies and individuals would buy up lots of property right across the border from their existing lands, and then exercise a lot of financial and political influence in the border areas. The Mexican government in the early 20th century was leery of this because, from their perspective, this how they lost control of Texas and Alta California. Additionally, this constitutional measure needs to be seen in the context of the Mexican political elites trying to exercise their sovereignty despite being economically dominated by the United States on whom they were dependent on for most of their manufactured goods. The Mexican economy in the 1900s-1930s was still strong dominated by extractive industries (farming, ranching, mining). The "Mexican Miracle" of becoming a firmly middle-income country via import-substitution industrialization didn't really take off until the 1940s and 1950s. Additionally, the expansion of the Mexican oil industry in the later 20th century (largely still state-owned, even today) made the central government less dependent on excise taxes and tariffs (administered by border states and ports!) for it's revenues.