Soviet/Communist style architecture: Necessity or Reactionary?

by Patriot_Historian

Hi.

When we think of the eastern bloc we tend to think of massive concrete structures that are utilitarian in form.

I was thinking about it today. Was this style common out of necessity (due to economic conditions) or as a reaction to Western style architecture (due to social reasons).

Thanks!

bojun

Much of that architecture was from necessity but with a political twist. WW2 devastated eastern European cities and a lot of building had to happen quickly and at low cost. Under communism, though, what we would call western architecture was also considered bourgeois, degenerate, and not at all aligned with the supposedly simple and pure needs of the proletariat. Sameness was a virtue, frivolity and individualism were viewed with great suspicion. The resultant concrete monstrosities were considered a great achievement for the communist regimes for providing housing consistent with the 'values' of the working man.