I came across this earlier today and there was some debate as to whether or not this was actually done.
My question is two-fold.
Did archers in particular, but also swordsman, cover their weapons with substances with the intention of causing disease?
Since germ theory wasn't introduced until the 16th century, and not universally recognized until the 17th century ... did they know what they were doing? If so, how?
No, English archers did not cover their arrows in shit or other substances with the intention of causing infection. While sticking their arrows in the dirt may have led to some wounds getting infected, this was more of a happy accident than a deliberate policy. Even if it did happen, it wouldn't have much of an impact on the immediate battlefield. If an enemy wasn't outright incapacitated by the arrow wound itself, it's not as if infection would instantly set in and cripple him. Besides, when English archers wanted to make sure that a wounded Frenchman stayed down, they would just slit his throat or bash the guy's head in while he was crawling around.