I read this and I get what you're going I just don't even know where to start because it's so...vague. What do you mean "bring [him] up"? What truth are you trying to "cut to", specifically? If you mean speaking on him not being the literal incarnate of Satan and the worst General in the history of man who maniacally sent men into their dooms for laughter then that perspective is dying down a lot recently. Being called a "revisionist" is not an inherently bad thing; history is about revision and revision and then revision on the revision. The revision these days, I've certainly noticed as I compare 2010+ works to say 1980's or 1990's works, is that Haig is getting a lot more of a fair treatment.

Regardless it would help if you had anything specific in mind. In any case /u/NMW has a fantastic post here about popular perceptions of Haig and dealing with them all; so this may interest you!

I'm thankful to /u/elos_ for alerting me to this thread! I'd be happy to delve into this matter a bit further, but I'd like to ask you to expand a bit on what it is you're after with this question. How best might I answer it?