Forgo all the mystical events I.e. the plagues and the parting of the sea etc. Just focusing on historical facts and records. Was there an event in or around Egypt that corresponded to the exodus?
If this is not the right venue then could you please point me to a subreddit where I can ask that question?
I strongly recommend (edit: this video lecture is better than the one I initially recommended) this video series for a synopsis of what's currently known and believed about the exodus and the hebrews.
As for further reading, try /r/AcademicBiblical:
Did Moses write the Torah and why do atheist argue he didn't exist?
Scholarly consensus (or majority belief) on the Bible authenticity?
J, P, E, D, etc. is it still the scholarly consensus of the Pentateuch's composition?
How do scholars determine the age and origins of Old Testament stories?
Was the Exodus a real historical event or how are we generally meant to understand it?
There's also a lot on /r/AskHistorians:
Does the Egyptian history record the ten plagues mentioned in the Bible?
Is there any reference to Moses, the plagues, or the Exodus in Ancient Egyptian writings?
Besides the Bible, are there other historical records of the Jewish being enslaved by the Egyptians?
What is the oldest Biblical story that is also mentioned by non-Jewish primary sources?
When you search a topic, use google instead of reddit. Try "site:reddit.com/r/AskHistorians searchterm searchterm". You'll usually get a few hits. (Obviously substitute "askhistorians" with whatever sub you're searching.) And please pop in over at /r/AcademicBiblical if you have further questions! We only bite a little.
This has previously been addressed. http://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/1grzha/the_reality_is_that_there_is_no_evidence/
Ultimately you aren't going to get a satisfying answer because the sole piece of evidence is the biblical book itself, and so your take on the historicity of the sorry is more or less entirely dependent on your take on the historicity of the text, or even ancient texts in general. One person may consider important events like that would be remembered, and this we can take it as broadly accurate. Others think that such tales from very distant times are invented to serve the purpose of the tellers. Others think there is a kernel of truth surrounded by embellishment.
Personally I like Ian Morris' take: there is a memory of the highly multicultural world of the late bronze age, but we can't really say anything about the event itself