The documentary really paints the picture that Edward Bernays is one of the most influential people of the 20th century. I feel like the intent of the documentary was more to tell a compelling story than to showcase multiple points of view or interpretations of the events but I honestly have no idea. Hoping someone who is basing their view off more than a single documentary can let me know what they think of the film's accuracy or bias.
Saw this same question was posted about two years ago but the responses seemed a bit underwhelming, hoping it's OK to repost.
or Adam Curtis generally. He came up in a recent comment for his claims from his 2004 film.