How much responsibility does Hirohito bear for the aggresion and actions of Japan in WWII

by modernafrican

I have just finished reading Jean Edward Smith's biography of FDR one if the things that intrigued me was the involvement of the emperor, in the events leading up to the beginning of the war.

  • on September 5th 1941 the emperor reprimanded the army chief of staff for his false estimate of the war with China (Konyone memoirs quoted in H. Feis the road to pearl harbor)
  • on September 6th 1941 the emperor chaired a privy council meeting that put a hard timeline on negotiations with the USA
  • The emperor directly intervened to make Tojo PM
  • on Dec 1 1941 the emperor was at the privy council meeting that pted for war

The emperor was a central figure in Japanese life and in a governmental system that borrowed a lot from Bismark's imperial German system the emperor had a lot of power (and i direct line to the army). Thus my questions are

  1. is responsible Hirohito for the course that the Japanese empire took and the brutality (i.e. Nanking) that was perpetrated by Japanese forces?
  2. Could he have stopped the march to war and could he have reigned in the armies brutality, if so why didn't he?, if not why couldn't he?
  3. How does modern Japanese and foreign historiography deal with emperors role in the conflict?
OldWorldGlory

You might be interested in some previous threads on the involvement of the Emperor of Japan in Japanese expansionism in the 1930s and 1940s: