Ask Historians isn't a place for homework questions. Having said that an invaluable resource on the subject is Pauline Maier's "Ratification: People Debate the Constitution".

It's probably the most thorough account of the ratification and debate process throughout America.

I will say this--the term anti-federalist was a term that was not used by opponents of the Constitution, but was applied to them by their opponents and then used by later historians. It was a wide coalition of groups that opposed ratification for a large number of reasons that varied from personal enmity amongst political figures, to local vs state control, to economic interests, to religious interests, to a host of other ones.

Much like there isn't a single reason for the Revolutionary War, there isn't a single reason for opposition or support to the Constitution.

Is this a homework question? It says in our rules: Our users aren't here to do your homework for you, but they might be willing to help. Remember: AskHistorians helps those who help themselves. Don't just give us your essay/assignment topic and ask us for ideas. Do some research of your own, then come to us with questions about what you've learned. This is explained further in this [META] thread. You can also consider asking the helpful people at /r/HomeworkHelp.