Without consideration the psychological impact on Americans, how successful were the Kamikaze's during WW2

by napalmjerry
bigslothonmyface

It depends on what you mean by "successful!" Kamikazes certainly did cause many casualties, but the rate at which they actually made contact with allied ships was pretty low.

Kamikazes killed about 5,000 allied sailors and sunk 34 allied ships over the course of the war.^1 In the battle of Okinawa alone, a quarter of participating US warships were at least hit by a kamikaze.^2

However, the large majority of kamikaze pilots actually ended up missing the ships they intended to hit -- only 15-20 percent actually made contact with the target.^3 Furthermore, allied defenses against kamikazes were sophisticated. Ships called "pickets" would circle the allied fleet and use radar to detect incoming planes, radioing the information on to allied aircraft who could intercept the kamikazes. Here's a decent diagram from Wikipedia. Fake assault waves were also sent ahead of actual assaults, armed with heavy anti-aircraft weapons in place of the transport ships the kamikaze pilots were expecting.^4

Overall, 5,000 deaths isn't a lot by WW2 standards, but the amount of fear that allied forces had of kamikaze pilots was clearly substantial enough that they expended a good chunk of time and energy on defending against them.

RonPolyp

I'm curious why OP is seemingly discounting the importance of the psychological impact.

It's like asking, "Without considering the terrified insomnia, how successful were Uncle Todd's bedtime ghost stories?"