Why did the Bible start a religion, whilst the vast amount of stories dating back to Gilgamesh didn't?

by hereforthemoney

I know this may seem like a simplistic question to many, but I was looking for an as academic response as possible without all the usual 'atheism .vs. theology' that tends to cloud any online discourse surrounding this topic. Consider me neutral on that whole side of things, as I want to focus on facts.

It's just that aspects of the Bible, such as the flood myth, were fairly common tropes throughout Mesopotamia. Why is it then that the Bible, along with the Koran, managed to 'hit a home-run' (so to speak) and establish much of the mainstream religion as we know it that was to follow right up till the present?

Thanks in advance!

husky54

The Bible didn't start a religion. The Bible was a product and function of religious beliefs already extant in the world that composed the various texts compiled within it.

So, the question is not about why the Bible "started" any religions--but why people chose to adhere to religions that produced those texts and adhered to those traditions.