Chinese crossbow similar to the Roman Ballista found. Simultaneous invention or result of trade?

by LonelyMachines

This little beastie was part of Qin Shi Huang's armament, which would place it in the middle of the 3rd century BCE. I was under the impression that there wasn't meaningful communication between Rome and China before the 2nd century CE.

Does this indicate that the two weapons were developed independently, or was there prior contact between the cultures I don't know about?

xingfenzhen

Considering how different they actually are when you look at the triggering mechanism (the most tricky part of the design, and one most likely to be copied. (Chinese (artifact), Roman), I would say developed independently.