I hope this question is appropriate here, sorry if not.
I'm currently seeing Star Trek (original series) for the first time after having watched The Wire and Dexter, and the contrast in acting techniques is extreme. Star Trek feels like watching a classic play, even ridiculously overacted at times, demonstrated by the episode "The Conscience of the King" where the cast is put next to a crew of Hamlet stage actors. (For the record, other series at the time are very much alike.) And while certainly not literally realistic, modern series have a much more life-like feel to them. Furthermore, there are some independent movies which experiment with actual realism today, something that would probably not have been thinkable in the earlier history of film.
Disregarding the advances in technology, what prompted this schism between stage and cinema / television acting? When and how did people first realize that cameras required a different style, and what were some milestone pieces I could watch to see that change?
ooh, great question & look forward to hearing from the experts regarding TV acting - or maybe it's just bad acting :) But to get you started, you may be interested in reading some earlier posts about the development of the System (aka the Method or Method Acting)
Why do actors in modern movies today feel more "real" than the acting we see in old movies like Casablanca? - responses by flairs /u/texpeare & /u/Harmania and many many others
thread in Tuesday Trivia | You're at a party, surrounded by strangers. They find out about your interest in history. What's one question you really hope they ask? - /u/created_sequel
Why is film acting from the 30's, 40's, and 50's, so much different than acting from the late 60's to today? - flaired user /u/BonSequitur and many others
Had something like Method acting been tried before? - more from /u/texpeare
there's more on acting styles sprinkled throughout this FAQ section Trans-Atlantic accent
book recommendations in the Book List History of Theater