From what I had known previously Nero was a more fair emperor to the working class than his predecessors and had several other positive aspects, why is he viewed in such an objectively bad light today?
Our best source for the Life of Nero is Tacitus The Annals of Imperial Rome. As I understand it there is some debate as to whether Tacitus generally supported or opposed the imperial government. He presented a lot of the emperors like Tiberius evenhandedly. However, his history of Nero's reign is undeniably negative.
It's possible that the positive sources of Nero's rule have just been lost. The other sources we have like Suetonius and Cassius Dio also seem to be negative.