Albert Schweitzer mentions in his book "The Quest of the Historical Jesus":
Not only do the events lack historical connection; we have no indication of a connecting thread in the actions and discourses of Jesus, because the sources give no hint of the character of his self-consciousness. They confine themselves to outward facts. We only begin to understand these historically when we can mentally place them in an intelligible connection and conceive them as the acts of a clearly defined personality.
Could you maybe outline what you mean by "style"?
The gospels might be unique in some ways, but they're also not really all that similar with each other, necessarily.