What's the current scholarly consensus on who wore the lorica segmentata?

by ParallelPain

Legionaries or auxiliaries, or both? Wikipedia says they're found in places garrisoned by auxiliaries, but Trajan's column depict them worn by legionaries.

Celebreth

Wikipedia generally doesn't know what it's talking about ;) Finds of segmentata fittings are relatively common across Roman military sites, mostly because they kept falling/breaking off due to chemical reactions between the bronze fittings and the iron plates, among other things. It's also a matter of debate whether or not these armour pieces were actively used or if they were mostly ceremonial: Goldsworthy, for example, believes that they were actively used, while some others note that we don't have any evidence of the armour's active use. Trajan's column is stylized - a perfect example of that is the shield design, which all re-enactors seem to take as canon (For example, try googling "Roman Shield" - the images will all invariably look like this. An actual Roman shield found near the Euphrates [Iraq/Syria-ish] looked like this.)

For the record, however, quoting directly from Goldsworthy's The Complete Roman Army:

There is absolutely no evidence that auxiliaries ever wore lorica segmentata, used the pilum or, with the possible exception of a handful of units called scutata, carried semi-cylindrical shields.

Hope that answers your question :)